All things considered as described in the linked article, this neighborhood watch seems benign and willing to help the Muslim citizens in their nei9ghborhood. Considering the rather militant clustering that has developed into “no go zones” where even European police are reluctant to tread it would be wise to see that these patrols don’t develop into the Morality police present in many Muslim fundamentalist regions overseas. Above all, decisions inspired by, and violations listed by Sharia should never be allowed to stand. American law must have 100% primacy over the customs and laws of their countries of origin.
“Don’t be an alarmist. Listen Chicken Little, the sky is not really falling!” Words of wisdom from the Lollipop Guild.
The mission statement of the Muslim Brotherhood, the wise old man and non-denominational umbrella organization that shades the Islamic Jihad from the light of truth, outlines a plan to conquer from within. The vid below exposes the strategy for the conquest of America.
The brotherhood’s last high profile thrust into nation stealing, (the Egyptian “Arab spring”) that ended when the winner, backed by the Brotherhood, attempted to impose Sharia law on Egyptians. Egypt, a long term actor on the world stage wasn’t about to be devolved into a sixth century backwater Caliphate. The world said “Yeah baby”. The Egyptian military, having a history of problems with the Brotherhood’s antics since the nineteen thirties, was not impressed and following a couple of bad moves (such as new dress codes for newscasters that included the hajib), the new regime was killed in the cradle when the army rolled in and the Brotherhood took to the hills.
Take a look at the vid below and see Muslim Brotherhoods members plan the roadmap of political conquest for the USA. Oh! by the way. The sky is falling!
Below is a link to a sight that will shed light to the intent of the brotherhood. You may not have heard about the brotherhood and that’s the way they want it. Under a guise of a benign social organization, the brotherhood has been the background organization for every Jihadi, since the late 1930’s regardless of their chosen moniker.
I am an Anglophile. It is a natural allegiance in that our founding fathers sometime had to shoot both ways because many colonials were still loyal to the crown during the Revolutionary war.. It was a conflagration that pleased some Americans and infuriated others. We had to have it out before the prodigal colonies could win their independence from home. Such was the crucible and cross fire we were born from.. After invading us and burning down our capital a few years later we got along famously. A few score later we tried to tear ourselves apart in a great civil war, in which 600 thousand fell to weld a new Union with a new covenant together. So I keep an east to see how things have gone over the puddle in England. We share a history and to a great extent, a shared temperament.
In my most incessant vacillation between believing in a omnipotent power behind the veil of this reality and advocating a good healthy cynicism there is one constant that always is present….. Christians are the best architects of societies that I like. Namely, the whole western culture, as it stands.
Whether you envision the higher power as some old man with a beard and white robes or a big fat Buddha smiling his way to Nirvana, certain religions lend themselves to a more or less comfortable working relationship with secular society. Keeping things on an even keel and moving forward, without fear of learning, technological, and/or social advancement.
The relative success, in stabilizing human behavior and in turn, stabilizing cultural behavior, seems wedded to the foundation of values and beliefs in the deepest place of each individual. Society suffers when there exists spiritual issues that foster, both internal and xenophobic dissent, as in the heart of Islam. The carnage of the middle east, with the exception of Israel and a couple of the more secular societies such as Jordan and Egypt, is born of a vision of violence. When Shia kills Sunni, sects born a milllenia and a half ago at the deathbed of Mohammed a basic a congenital defect is revealed that has not been resolved. The rigor that set in at birth dictates that Islam will not, or cannot, move to accommodate change in human nature…..
Islamic law, set down in the Sharia”. written 1500 years ago and has not evolved one iota since. If you are in a Sharia court, say, one of the several working in Briton RIGHT NOW, you can have your arm amputated for stealing a jar of baby food. For real or merely suspected marital infidelity, a woman can be stoned to death. Sharia, the adopted child of the harsh desert world of Bedouin nomadic culture, will not or cannot give way to the law of the lands that allow the Islamic diaspora to squat on western territory.
The misogynist foundation of Islamic culture opens the gate to such horrors as Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) with each male at the head of the nuclear family given the status of nabob and final arbiter of right and wrong in the family. When I have confronted this position of each man the ultimate power in the Islamic family, I have received the rather lame apologetics (I don’t agree with it but ……I CAN UNDERSTAND HIS MOTIVATION). Denial…….. with a whisper of consent?
Separate laws call for territories of jurisdiction. Thus the growth of self made Ghettos of Islamic immigrants, the “no go” zones, where even police are reluctant to tread. Integration to host countries is not the point….regardless of how small or large the territory in question is, omnipotent Caliphates untouched by the umbrella of western culture, are the end game..
This woman’s face has been blurred for good reason. Her fate may be the jail, the whipping post, or the noose. When confronted on the street by a cleric who threatened her with arrest because her hijab was being worn inappropriately, she let him have it with both barrels. (Klikit for more text and a vid.)
Where are feminists who so bravely wage war against fetuses and traditional marriage? Where are the Code Pink ladies and their big pink vagina signs meant to sexually shame and shock the oppressive white male establishment? In a world where a husband can kill a wife or daughter for reasons of honor and walk away unscathed by little inconveniences such as laws concerning murder, this woman shows true grit and courage. She took a real risk in standing her ground. She is worthy of respect.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Remember the name. She has been around a while and those who have followed the Muslim issue should be familiar. Ms. Ali is a woman of exquisite physical beauty. A woman who, raised as Muslim, has been subjected to many of the indignities of being a Muslim female (arranged marriages, genital mutilation etc.).
But her quiet dignity imparts humility and honesty. And her gaze speaks to a clarity of vision that closes most mouths and arguments.The article linked is but a paraphrase of beliefs she has imparted, but more with Ayaan will be forthcoming. She is good people. She is a rock.
Of the worlds top 500 universities, not one is from a Muslim country.
When one speaks of Muslim contributions to science; most of the activity took place hundreds of years ago. The Muslim wants to turn back time to an earlier simpler era; you know, where no one would give you an embarrassing stare when you bust a cap in your daughters head, or take a sex slave or two. Most other spiritual belief systems fight to quell the natural drives, (feeding, fighting, fleeing and sex). The Koran promotes living a life in service to those same primitive drives. It is the misogynous males paradise.
There has been an inversion of values. The old “my body is a temple” coercian shares a common pulse with Liberal DooGooders-or-else” bunch hangin a the juice bar. We have prolonged life but have not prolonged the quality of longer lives. We have killed God but not our fear of death. Some gobble hormones and powerwalk, diet tours, hi colonics, and copper bracelets we appear as desperate “also rans” in the race for immortality. We have increased the misery that is in the world exponentially as the aged lose what defines life. Eyesight fades, taste goes flat, touch becomes numb, music reduced to a dull thud as hearing fades. And the length of life is increased. We now are growing gardens of retarded decay. We have delayed death but not decrepitude. But now we have Gardens of decay in our midst. We have replaced heaven with oblivion and it just feels “uncomfortable”. So now the health industry, a multi-billion dollar quality/quantity industry takes the place of a life dedicted to following religious principles.
The death cult of Islam, on the other hand, will kill on a whim. And it isn’t the killing that troubles Islam. Pleasure and the regulation of pleasure is the very core of Islam. In a culture with the ethos of the “Id” the fine tuning required for a mutually equitable partnership is a source of consternation. Conflict with self is deadly to a warrior. So control must be absolute. A crack is as good as abyss to a Bedouin, caravan raider like Mo. Like all,despots, when, he died there was a fight for control of the gang (Ref. Christining scene from Godfather 1) .
Christ lived and died a pauper, unlike Mo, he didn’t insist on dying with the biggest pile of toys, the most poontang and high score on kills and thrills in a the beheading dept. When this quaint little cult remained roaming the sands of the Sahara or some centuries later a backwater in Malaysia, no harm done. They could treat their own population like they wanted. to, after all they were “different” than us. It just didn’t seem as bad.
Now the little Bedouin religion that could is in conflict with the civilized world. They are set upon from every quarter by information. Information, is poisonous to bad religion. Information is often unwelcome in the inflexible systems of beliefs. Christianty has shown flexibility. As the foundations of society evolve so has Christianity evolved, at varying rates of course and in different ways. Now the gadfly question lies in finding out where the boundaries should be held firm or adjusted. How accommodating can a religion be before it loses it’s original identity?
For Islam, there are quite a few who believe they should uphold 7th century standards at all costs. There is the rub. As a psychologist, and most painfully, as a father of five daughters, I have experience with the politics of power in relatiomships. A system threatened by influence from without becomes rigid and sensitive to every indication of individual thinking. Behaviours that in times of less threat would offer no aggravation now are smitten down with an iron hand. Control on all fronts is the issue. Such micromanaging of behavior is a sure sign of a threatened reqime. An Islam threatened chops heads off for firing up. They see smoking a cigarette as far worse than beheading the smoker? Sumthin’ is wrong here.
The seventh century rears it’s primitive visage in Britain. One must at least entertain the idea that some form of compensatory back swing is happening in reaction to the sin of past empire. This may be an oversimplification. The same rule of colonialism cannot be easily fit to America. The old feeling was “our differences end at the waters edge.” I appears that the modern liberal assumes what ever the prevailing third-world perception of America happens to be at that moment. Many of the nabobs and potentates out there saulve their constituents feeling about shortcoming in their lives by blaming “it” whatever ” it ” is, on the big bad, great Satan/boogeyman America. This serve the dual purpose of quieting the restless spirits of the “masses” as well as distracting said masses away from the real culprit. THEM.
So we get this weird self-loathing from what seems like nowhere. Sheeeeesh